March 7, 2014
Sadly, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen a story like acclaimed actor Philip Seymour Hoffman’s play out. Early this month, the headlines announced the lead Capote star’s premature death from an apparent drug overdose. This week, we find that as his loved ones attend to their grief, so must they contend with complicated issues arising from his poorly planned estate. Though Hoffman had thoughtfully created a will, it was over a decade old. Consequently, it not only contained gross omissions but was poorly designed to minimize the tax burden on his benefactors.
While Hoffman’s will included his son Cooper, his two daughters born after the will was made (and never amended) were effectively disinherited. New York law attempts to protect children with a special provision for this kind of scenario, but there’s no guarantee it will apply. These are not the kinds of matters you want to leave for the courts.
 Then there’s the mother of Hoffman’s three children-his longtime companion Marianne O’Donnell. She will reportedly inherit Hoffman’s estate outside the money allocated for his son. Had the couple been married, O’Donnell would have received an unlimited amount tax-free. Because they weren’t, O’Donnell will hand over anywhere from $11 to $15 million in taxes if the actor’s $35 million estate figure is right. No matter how the two felt about the institution of marriage, Hoffman’s estate planners could still have mitigated some tax expenses through other strategies, including trusts and gifted amounts during his lifetime.
Celebrities may be more likely to make the news, but they are far from the only ones with poorly planned estates. We understand how periodic reviews can seem less than urgent against the barrage of all of our growing to-do lists. So what’s our best advice? Schedule a regular time with your advisory team to review your will and update your estate. Once built into your calendar, you’ll not only have peace of mind but a signed legacy of caring and responsibility your loved ones will appreciate.
 So go ahead, make that appointment.
February 21, 2014
Michael Jackson had an amazing 13 number 1 hits as a solo artist, but the enormous disparity between the IRS and his estate’s executors in the valuation of his assets – to the tune of more than a billion – really tops the charts. 
How bad is it? Well, the IRS will tell you Michael Jackson’s estate was worth $1.125 billion at his death. Yet if you ask the estate’s executors, they’ll say it was more like $7 million. Yes, you read that right: billion versus million. From the IRS’s point of view, the estate’s undervaluation is so egregious that it qualifies for double the typical 20% penalty for underpayment. The agency is asking for the $505 million in taxes it finds the estate owes and an additional $197 million in penalties, totaling over $702 million.
There are points of contention between the two sides on almost every kind of asset, from music rights to automobiles. For starters, the IRS believes the use of Jackson’s likeness to create income is worth $434 million, yet Jackson’s executors assert it’s worth just $2,105. We can’t be sure who’s right on this one, but come on, there are washer/dryers worth more than that. Here’s another one – the IRS claims Jackson’s rights to certain Beatles songs are worth $469 million, not $0 as executors claim. Again, we’ll never know for sure who’s more on target, but a CPA did previously testify that Jackson borrowed $320 million against the music catalog.
As for MJ’s share to the rights of Jackson 5 master recordings? The IRS believes it’s worth $45.5 million, and the Jackson estate says $11.193 million. The battle that ensues over the taxable value of all these assets will be a big one, with both teams already singing vastly different tunes.
Getting agreement from the IRS on an asset’s value doesn’t just affect the likes of pop stars and celebrities. It’s true few of us deal with assets as unique and challenging to appraise as Beatles songs, master recordings, and the marketability of our likenesses. But even so, making sure appraisals of stocks, real estate, businesses, or any other more standard assets are fair and creditable can make all the difference when it comes to sailing swiftly through a potential audit – and maybe even avoiding one altogether.